Taking the view that the complaint disclosed adequate material for proceeding against the appellant in terms of Section read with Section of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the High Court refused to accede to the prayer of the appellant and dismissed the application filed under Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The appointing authority in this matter, i. In Guide to the Companies Act by A. The relevant statement in the complaint read: So it is apparent that there is no dispute between clause 62 and clause Learned counsel for B.
Domiciliary treatment and medical attendance of self and family members as defined under Service Medical Attendance Rules by RMP including cost of medicines, appliances, diagnostic and pathological tests, treatment of immunizing and prophylactic purposes on actual expense basis not exceeding the prescribed limit.
The amount of advance will be based on estimates to be obtained from hospital as per CGHS scheme of Central Government. At the outset, it is pertinent to note that in the usual Government contracts, the reference to which would be made immediately hereafter, there is exclusion of some matters from the purview of arbitration and a senior officer of the Department usually is given the Bharat sancharnigam ltd and power to adjudicate the same.
The appeal is therefore dismissed. The Broadband customer base of 3. Again in Bharat sancharnigam ltd case of Sarvesh Chopra, this court had held that the claims covered by the no claims clause, i.
We find that such an allegation is clearly made in the complaint which we have quoted above.
Section of the Act is an instance of specific provision which in case an offence under Section is committed by a Company, extends criminal liability for dishonour of cheque to officers of the Company. In the case on hand, reading the complaint as a whole, it is clear that the allegations in the complaint are that at the time at which the two dishonoured cheques were issued by the company, the appellant and another were the Directors of the company and were incharge of the affairs of the company.
The complaint also asserted that all the accused were guilty of the offence in terms of Section of the Negotiable Instruments Act and were liable to be punished therefor. In the event of such an arbitrator to whom the matter is originally referred, being transferred or vacating his office or being unable to act for any reason whatsoever, the CGM, Kerala Telecom Circle, BSNL or the said officer shall appoint another person to act as an arbitrator in accordance with the terms of the agreement and the person so appointed Bharat sancharnigam ltd be entitled to proceed from the stage at which it was left out by his predecessors The corporation has also launched 3G services in select cities across the country.
The introduction of MNP Mobile Number Portability which is an service that lets the consumer change wireless service providers while retaining their actual mobile number, BSNL has seen many customers opting for this service to move away from the services to other operators.
These decisions indicate that too technical an approach on the sufficiency of notice and the contents of the complaint is not warranted in the context of the purpose sought to be achieved by the introduction of Sections and of the Act. There is in fact no conflict between clause 62 and A company being a juristic person, all its deeds and functions are result of acts of others.
In the complaint, B. They are jointly and severally liable for the acts of accused No. The turnover, nationwide coverage, reach, comprehensive range of telecom services and the desire to excel has made BSNL the No. Allopathic, Homeopathic, Ayurvedic, Naturopathy, Yogic etc.
It is clear from the reading of clause The scope of Section has been authoritatively discussed in the decision in S. The view was reiterated in Rajneesh Aggarwal Vs.
Sreekanth Transport 10 4 SCCwhich has given the following principles relating to "Excepting matters" as under: BSNL serves its customers with its wide bouquet of telecom services. Learned counsel also relied heavily on the decision in Saroj Kumar Poddar Vs. BSNL operates as a public sector. The Law Merchant treated negotiable instruments as instruments that oiled the wheels of commerce and facilitated quick and prompt deals and transactions.
Gujarat State Fertilizer Co.Bharat Sanchar Nigam [BSNL] Customer Care Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (known as BSNL, India Communications Corporation Limited) is a public sector communications company in India.
Company has decided to install more than Infratel across the country and shall shortly issue the detailed official guidelines to install BSNl tower in your Plot, Roof top, Field, Market etc.